Recently, the talk of the school has been the new policy regarding no tech or talking at the JUG table. Vice Principal of Student Life Mr. Deklotz ‘88 shared the rationale behind the administration’s choice.
“The last three years, we’ve seen an increase in JUG numbers, and some of the feedback and comments I have received from students are like, ‘Oh, a JUG isn’t that bad,’” Deklotz said.
JUGs are meant to correct student behavior so they will not violate school policies. When students have an enjoyable experience at the JUG table or even ask for a JUG, the consequence may not act as a deterrent.
Deklotz believes that if the effect a JUG is meant to serve begins to be put into place, that it will prevent students from getting JUGs.
Junior Charlotte Kroeknee received a JUG for her phone on the second day of school.
“The no tech and no talking policies are super big changes. I did not like my JUG experience and definitely don’t want to get one again.”
As Deklotz predicted, students are no longer enjoying their time at the JUG table. It is something students will now avoid as best as they can because the consequence isn’t seen as “fun” anymore.
Additionally, Deklotz thinks students will spend their time more wisely at the JUG table now.
“There’s other things, rather than talking, much like a silent study time. Whether it’s reading a book, reading a syllabus, or organizing yourself,” Deklotz says
On the other hand, junior Lucy Hasle believes otherwise.
“I think we should be able to have our iPads at the lunch table if we are not allowed to talk so we can do independent study and get homework done.”
